Part I: Log
Date(s)
|
Activity/Time
|
PSC Standard, Element
&
BOR Strand, Element
&
NETS-A Standard, Element
|
9-7-11
|
Interviewed Principal about school’s
professional learning plan. (1 hour)
|
PSC 5.1, 5.2, 5.3
|
9-10-11
|
Received and reviewed end of year teacher
survey on professional needs for the upcoming 2011-2012 school year. (2 hours)
|
PSC 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 5.1
|
9-16-11
9-17-11
9-20-11
|
Reviewed School Strategic Plan and worked
on GAPSS analysis (17 hours)
|
PSC 2.8,5.1, 5.2, 5.3
|
9-18-11
|
Created and sent out a survey in Google
Docs to teachers within my school about current technology use. Consolidated
data for use with GAPSS analysis. (2hours)
|
PSC 3.3, 3.7, 5.1
|
10-18-11
|
Designed a Professional Learning Plan for
school based on GAPSS analysis (5 hours)
|
PSC 2.3, 2.5, 2.6
|
10-20-11
|
Designed an Evaluation plan to assess the
Professional Learning Plan (2 hours)
|
PSC 2.7, 5.3
|
10 -26-11
|
Provided a training session for teachers
based on PLP on how to create test keys and parse a test from Word into
iRespond (2.5)
|
PSC 3.2, 3.4, 3.6, 4.3, 5.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Hours: [30.5 hours ]
|
|
DIVERSITY
(Place an X in the box representing the race/ethnicity and subgroups involved in this field experience.) |
||||||||
Ethnicity
|
P-12 Faculty/Staff
|
P-12 Students
|
||||||
|
P-2
|
3-5
|
6-8
|
9-12
|
P-2
|
3-5
|
6-8
|
9-12
|
Race/Ethnicity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asian
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Black
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
Hispanic
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
Native
American/Alaskan Native
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
White
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
Multiracial
|
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
Subgroups:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Students with Disabilities
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
Limited English Proficiency
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
Eligible for Free/Reduced Meals
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
Part II: Reflection
CANDIDATE REFLECTIONS:
(Minimum of 3-4 sentences per question)
|
1.
Briefly
describe the field experience. What did you learn about technology
facilitation and leadership from completing this field experience?
In gathering and preparing the GAPSS
analysis, I realized that there are many components and people that need to
be considered when reviewing and developing professional development that
will ultimately improve student learning. As technology continues to grow, so
do the needs of both students and teachers. Having technology facilitators
would help schools not only learn what new technologies are available, but
would provide the knowledge and training needed to help teachers use this
technology with students.
|
2. How did this learning relate to the knowledge (what must
you know), skills (what must you
be able to do) and dispositions (attitudes,
beliefs, enthusiasm) required of a technology
facilitator or technology leader? (Refer to the standards you selected in
Part I. Use the language of the PSC standards in your answer and reflect on
all 3—knowledge, skills, and dispositions.)
A technology facilitator or leader would
need to know the needs of both the students and teachers within a school to
design and implement technology training for teachers. He/ She would need to
not only manage the digital tools, but also plan to differentiate based on the
needs of the teachers. By assessing the needs, he/ she may discover attitudes
and beliefs within the teachers that will help in planning effective
professional development. Finally, an evaluation of the training should be
given to help identify if the training met the intended outcome. It would
also show strengths within the training, areas needing revision, and give
ideas for future training needs.
|
3. Describe how this field experience impacted school improvement,
faculty development or student learning at your school. How can the impact be
assessed?
This field experience has positively
impacted faculty development at my school. Teachers are becoming more
comfortable with the use of iRespond student response systems. Many are using
them for tests other than the benchmark and checkpoint tests required by the
county. The instant feedback that comes from use of the student response
systems allows teachers to see strengths and weaknesses of students much
quicker so they can modify instruction to better meet the needs of our
students. To assess the impact, a teacher survey should be given to determine
how much the student response systems are being used and to what extent.
|
Part I: Log
Date(s)
|
Activity/Time
|
PSC Standard, Element
&
BOR Strand, Element
&
NETS-A Standard, Element
|
August and September 2011
|
Assisted new teachers and several
returning teachers with the setting up of their classroom iRespond systems.
(3 hours)
|
PSC 1.4, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1
|
9-24-11
9-31-11
|
Provided Promethean training to teachers
new to Green Acres this year. (2 hours)
|
PSC 1.4, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1
|
September through December 2011
|
Updated school website – created new
faculty page and updated hyperlinks for the computer lab page. Also added
information for the new parent portal for Pinnacle. (10 hours)
|
PSC 3.3, 3.5, 3.7, 4.3, 6.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Hours: [15 hours ]
|
|
DIVERSITY
(Place an X in the box representing the race/ethnicity and subgroups involved in this field experience.) |
||||||||
Ethnicity
|
P-12 Faculty/Staff
|
P-12 Students
|
||||||
|
P-2
|
3-5
|
6-8
|
9-12
|
P-2
|
3-5
|
6-8
|
9-12
|
Race/Ethnicity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asian
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Black
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hispanic
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Native
American/Alaskan Native
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
White
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiracial
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subgroups:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Students with Disabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited English Proficiency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eligible for Free/Reduced Meals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part II: Reflection
CANDIDATE REFLECTIONS:
(Minimum of 3-4 sentences per question)
|
1.
Briefly
describe the field experience. What did you learn about technology
facilitation and leadership from completing this field experience?
I worked with mostly new teachers and
showed them how the iRespond student response systems connect to their
computer as well as basic use. I also showed them the basics of the
Promethean board and how to find resources on Promethean planet and the
school T:drive. With teacher turnover at schools, including transfers and new
hires, it helps to have a technology facilitator to assist in the training of
those teachers with school technology that they may not be familiar with. If
a school does not have a facilitator, it would help to have a list of
teachers who feel like they are proficient with certain tools or programs and
would be willing to help with the training of new personnel.
Managing the website is a tedious task but
provides a site that hopefully is beneficial to staff, students and their
families, and the community at large. This is one area where I am still
learning every time I go to work on it.
|
2. How did this learning relate to the knowledge (what must
you know), skills (what must you
be able to do) and dispositions (attitudes,
beliefs, enthusiasm) required of a technology
facilitator or technology leader? (Refer to the standards you selected in
Part I. Use the language of the PSC standards in your answer and reflect on
all 3—knowledge, skills, and dispositions.)
A technology facilitator or leader would
need to know the programs and tools used most often by teachers at a school
to provide training and ongoing support to new teachers or teachers new to
the technology. The facilitator would need to plan a convenient time to
provide the training and provide materials (or a place where they can be
found) to assist the teachers when the facilitator is not accessible.
Providing additional support and follow up after training will help promote
positive attitudes towards the required use of certain technology programs
and/ or tools. Website maintenance is time consuming but provides a central
place for a great deal of information related to the school. I am still
learning the nuances of the program used for website creation and maintenance
provided by the county.
|
3. Describe how this field experience impacted school improvement,
faculty development or student learning at your school. How can the impact be
assessed?
This field experience has helped new
teachers learn how to use the Promethean board which directly affects student
learning. The impact can be assessed by seeing the use of the Promethean
board in daily instruction. Integrating the use of iRespond for assessments
will allow teachers quicker access to test results so they can then modify
instruction if needed. Teacher lesson plans that show modifications as a
result of testing is one way to assess the impact of the use of the SRS. The
website provides information for faculty, students, parents and community
members. The faculty page provides e-mail access to all faculty members and
the computer page provides links that students can use both at school and at
home. Monitor how many “hits” the website is receiving in addition to
parental feedback from surveys.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment